Film Notes

By

Halford Fairchild

February 5, 2008

 

Maulana Karenga:  Kawaida, Culture and Psychology: The Issue of Human Wholeness  Invited Presentation at the Annual Convention of The Association of Black Psychologists, Los Angeles, CA, August 1995.

 

Dr. Wade Nobles presented a detailed introduction of the speaker, which noted that he is Professor and Chair of the Black Studies Department at Cal State Long Beach, the holder of two Ph.D.s, the author of two books, the creator of Kwanzaa and the Nguzo Saba, and an internationally renowned scholar/activist. 

 

Karenga greeted the audience with his trademark “Habari Gani” (“What’s the News”), “Hotep” (Peace), and Asante Sana (Thank You).

 

“Our beginning was great and good,” and we must achieve that greatness, and goodness, in the reclamation project of African humanity.  His focus, within the Kawaida project (a philosophical project that led to Kwanzaa and the Nguzo Saba), to re-discover what it means to be both African and human. 

 

He uses the Akan term, Sankofa, as a metaphor for returning to the source and exploring the nature of human wholeness.

 

He quoted Joseph White’s 1970 article on the nature of Black psychology who called for the development of an ‘authentic’ Black psychology out of the experiences of Black people.

 

He noted that Diop (Cheikh Anta Diop, the noted Egyptologist who proved the Blackness of the ancient Egyptians), saw the importance of his work as reconciling the contributions of African people to human history. 

 

He recalled several of the points made by Wade Nobles, that the Black psychology project is the liberation of the African mind, the empowering of the African character, and the illuminating and enlivening of the African spirit.

 

He noted that notions of “the self” ought to be multi-dimensional, involving corporality (physicality), spirituality, personality and naturality.

 

Corporality recognizes that the self exists in a body.  And the body’s suffering is a means to gain empathy for others and to realize one’s own humanity.  But he also called for an “anthrocosmic” orientation – the physical body exists in a space, that space being the world in which we live.

 

[The idea of suffering reminds me of an article on “Self Suffering” that I authored in 2000, that recalled a lesson learned from Mahatma Gandhi – we claim our humanity through our suffering, which is why he fasted until he nearly died.]

 

The psychological ideas of mind and spirit must recognize that these constructs exist in a real person that has corporality.

 

Personality and personhood are not the same.  Personhood relates to what it really means to be a human being.

 

The Maafa (which Karenga also calls the Holocaust) is a “rupture – a tearing in the fabric of human existence.  It is in sharp contrast to Linda James Myers idea of an optimal self. 

 

We engage too much in over-indulgence on the self.  Instead, the self is embedded in a social network.

 

Our challenges:  (1) to counter the debasing effects of American individualism; (2) to counter the dehumanizing effects of the profit motive in market-driven concepts regarding ‘self-fulfillment,’ and (3) recover human agency from the ‘holocaust’ of enslavement. 

 

This African Maafa, or holocaust, was an act of genocide so morally monstrous it was a crime against humanity.  Now, we must engage in a period of re-affirmation.  The Maafa (Holocaust) was a destruction of human culture, it produced psychic damage in the survivors and their descendants; it produced the destruction of human possibility; it was a system of suppression that led to self-destruction and the diminishment of human agency.

 

One of the challenges is to find a way to talk about the Maafa, to define it in a way that it can be properly addressed and redressed.  Definition is important.

 

The enslavement period was not a “slave trade,” which acquiesces to the dehumanization of the captured humans.  It was a moral problem, not an issue of business or commerce. 

 

“Power is the ability to define reality and to have others accept it even to their own disadvantage.”

 

Should we stress the suffering of African people?  Or their resilience/resistance?

 

The psychological paradigm encourages us to go to the mirror and reaffirm our love for ourselves; but more important is to confront the monster that drove you to the mirror in the first place.

 

It is OK to love yourself.  It is even more important to be worthy of love by others.

 

How do we engage socially, versus withdrawing into an individual self-indulgence?

 

Self-esteem and Self-respect are very different constructs:

 

Self Esteem

Self Respect

Self indulgent

Individualism

Go shopping to feel good

Burger King:  Have it your way (?)

No social requirement for Self-Esteem

You can be destructive to others, and feel good about yourself (e.g., gang initiations)

A sense of worthiness based on conduct and achievement within a value system that can justify itself through moral reasoning.  (e.g., Ma’at)

 

 

 

Healing:  involves the soul, spirit, body, and the social conditions.  Healers (psychologists) must heal the objective life circumstances that people are in.

 

Our challenge is to be more socially active.

 

MLK noted that religions must be socially active, to address and correct the external conditions of the people.

 

My reactions:

·       FYI:  I was Chair of the Program Committee for the Convention, and was instrumental in inviting Karenga to speak.

·       Karenga is a fairly controversial figure.  We (the IDBS) would probably never approve his speaking in Claremont, for reasons that I don’t understand.  In my view, he is a living legend.  A GIANT of an intellect.  He is also fairly unassuming, kind, and humble.

·       The introduction was probably too long, because we were under extreme time pressure.  The program went over by about an hour, which messed up a lot the rest of the day.  But my sense was that it was worth it and we should have relaxed more about it.  (Na’im Akbar also spoke at that luncheon.)

·       I liked the echoes with our course material:  Kwanzaa, Nguzo Saba, Sankofa, and the fact that he mentioned by name a number of people that we are becoming familiar with:  Nobles, Akbar, Joe White, Linda Myers, and others.

·       I liked his idea of an anthrocosmic orientation.

·       I very much resonated with his emphasis on the collective, and his call for social activism and changing the external circumstances that confront people of (more recent) African descent.

·       The Maafa has gone on for 400-500 years.  How long will it take to reverse its effects?  How long will it take to recognize it for what it is, and to stop its continuation?

·       The moral dilemma of enslavement is a nice dovetail to the Rediker article on atonement.